<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Thing&#8221; Trailer Emerges!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scarsmagazine.com/blog/2011/07/15/the-thing-trailer-emerges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scarsmagazine.com/blog/2011/07/15/the-thing-trailer-emerges/</link>
	<description>THE MAGAZINE THAT LEAVES MARKS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:16:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://scarsmagazine.com/blog/2011/07/15/the-thing-trailer-emerges/comment-page-1/#comment-4156</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scarsmagazine.com/blog/?p=3896#comment-4156</guid>
		<description>To quote a famous Jack the Ripper criminologist: &quot;I&#039;m so on the fence about this that I&#039;m developing hemorrhoids.&quot;

I&#039;ll be honest, it looks okay and seems to be faithful (too faithful even) to Carpenter&#039;s version, which makes me wonder what the point is. Remakes like this are such a gamble because most of them are just given a repolish with some cool new effects added, and that doesn&#039;t cut it with me.

Sure, it will make money...



...what else can I say really?

But I&#039;ll reserve final judgement until I have viewed it for myself (which is all any of us can do at the end of the day) and pray that it doesn&#039;t suck ass. I really want to be proven wrong because I love both the original and Carpenter&#039;s version so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote a famous Jack the Ripper criminologist: &#8220;I&#8217;m so on the fence about this that I&#8217;m developing hemorrhoids.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, it looks okay and seems to be faithful (too faithful even) to Carpenter&#8217;s version, which makes me wonder what the point is. Remakes like this are such a gamble because most of them are just given a repolish with some cool new effects added, and that doesn&#8217;t cut it with me.</p>
<p>Sure, it will make money&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;what else can I say really?</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll reserve final judgement until I have viewed it for myself (which is all any of us can do at the end of the day) and pray that it doesn&#8217;t suck ass. I really want to be proven wrong because I love both the original and Carpenter&#8217;s version so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.680 seconds -->
